|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 4:39 PM
Posts: 52,
Visits: 90
|
|
http://docs.house.gov/rules/health/111_ahcaa.pdf
Here it is, and here's what's especially outrageous.
pdf p 296
9 TITLE V—AMENDMENTS TO IN10
TERNAL REVENUE CODE OF
11 1986
12 Subtitle A—Provisions Relating to
13 Health Care Reform
14 PART 1—SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
15 Subpart A—Individual Responsibility
16 SEC. 501. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE
17 HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter A of chapter 1 of the
19 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at
20 the end the following new part:
21 ‘‘PART VIII—HEALTH CARE RELATED TAXES
‘‘SUBPART A. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE
COVERAGE.
22 ‘‘Subpart A—Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable
23 Health Care Coverage
‘‘Sec. 59B. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.
pdf p297
‘‘SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE
2 HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
3 ‘‘(a) TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual
4 who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at
5 any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed
6 a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of—
7 ‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross in8
come for the taxable year, over
9 ‘‘(2) the amount of gross income specified in
10 section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.
pdf p1211
TITLE III—PREVENTION AND WELLNESS
Sec. 2301. Prevention and wellness.
‘‘TITLE XXXI—PREVENTION AND WELLNESS
‘‘Subtitle A—Prevention and Wellness Trust
‘‘Sec. 3111. Prevention and Wellness Trust.
‘‘Subtitle B—National Prevention and Wellness Strategy
‘‘Sec. 3121. National Prevention and Wellness Strategy.
‘‘Subtitle C—Prevention Task Forces
‘‘Sec. 3131. Task Force on Clinical Preventive Services.
‘‘Sec. 3132. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.
‘‘Subtitle D—Prevention and Wellness Research
‘‘Sec. 3141. Prevention and wellness research activity coordination.
‘‘Sec. 3142. Community prevention and wellness research grants.
‘‘Sec. 3143. Research on subsidies and rewards to encourage wellness and
healthy behaviors.
‘‘Subtitle E—Delivery of Community Prevention and Wellness Services
‘‘Sec. 3151. Community prevention and wellness services grants.
pdf p1214
SEC. 2002. PUBLIC HEALTH INVESTMENT FUND.
4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF FUNDS.—
5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to section 2003,
6 there is hereby established in the Treasury a sepa7
rate account to be known as the ‘‘Public Health In8
vestment Fund’’ (referred to in this section and sec9
tion 2003 as the ‘‘Fund’’).
10 (2) FUNDING.—
11 (A) There shall be deposited into the
12 Fund—
13 (i) for fiscal year 2011,
14 $4,600,000,000;
15 (ii) for fiscal year 2012,
16 $5,600,000,000;
17 (iii) for fiscal year 2013,
18 $6,900,000,000;
19 (iv) for fiscal year 2014,
20 $7,800,000,000; and
21 (v) for fiscal year 2015,
22 $9,000,000,000.
pdf p1307
13 ‘‘(c) INCLUSION IN ESSENTIAL BENEFITS PACK14
AGE.—If, on the basis of the findings of research and dem15
onstration projects under subsection (a) or other sources
16 consistent with section 3131, the Task Force on Clinical
17 Preventive Services determines that a subsidy or reward
18 meets the Task Force’s standards for a grade A or B,
19 the Secretary shall ensure that the subsidy or reward is
20 included in the essential benefits package under section
[These "rewards" are for true believers in their charlatan health dogmas.]
pdf p1434
4 (d) USE OF FUNDS.—Any infant mortality pilot pro5
gram funded under this section may—
...
11 (3) develop and implement standardized sys12
tems for improved access, utilization, and quality of
13 social, educational, and clinical services to promote
14 healthy pregnancies, full term births, and healthy in15
fancies delivered to women and their infants, such
16 as—
21 (D) additional counseling for at-risk moth22
ers, including smoking cessation programs, ...
Smoking does not cause preterm births, and the fact that the rates of preterm birth have steadily risen over the past 20-plus years, despite declines in smoking and teenage births and increases in prenatal care, is the population-wide proof of this. Furthermore, their pretense that smoking causes preterm birth is based on the deliberate scientfiic fraud of ignoring an enormous, gold-standard study funded by NINDS which proved that infections were the real cause, furthermore, and that clinicians missed 90% of these infections; while relying on studies based on nothing but LIFESTYLE QUESTIONNAIRES in order to falsely blame smoking.
http://www.smokershistory.com/perinata.htm
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:58 PM
Posts: 504,
Visits: 633
|
|
purplepenquin (11/8/2009)
If those tissues are free then I'll take a whole box....
Don't worry, your new insurance will cover them.
That way I won't have to pay for them.
________________________________________________The ALL NEW Madison.com! 60% of the time, it works every time! 
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 6:56 AM
Posts: 23,
Visits: 41
|
|
Darwin, your "Typical Republican Fear tactics to protect profits & kickbacks" is way off the mark. I'm more Democrat then Republican. I took the test and it positioned me on the Moderate to Liberal scale. And for your edification, I have voted Democrat more times then 3rd party and republican. I even voted for Feingold and Baldwin. No longer for Baldwin any more.
And I believe that this health care bill is morally and financially wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, November 08, 2009 9:54 PM
Posts: 3,
Visits: 7
|
|
| I wouldn't get too worked up about the house bill. It won't get far. It's just on the record to placate the big chunk of the Dem base that demands single payer for all. That's not doable so they get a good ole college try from the house, then a heavily watered down compromise that does little but gives us all something to discuss during the mid-terms.
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:40 AM
Posts: 814,
Visits: 6,501
|
|
Literate (11/8/2009)
purplepenquin (11/8/2009)
Thanks for putting me in jail if I don't buy health insurance.
Do you really believe that is going to happen? Are you really that paranoid?
I can just imagine homeland security agents prowling the streets asking: Your insurance card, please."
The only problem with the scenario is lack of jail space. Unless they legalize drugs and release everyone held on drug offenses there's no way they could jail even a fraction of the millions without insurance. Besides, if they did jail them, the taxpayer would end up footing their health care costs anyway.
Maybe it's time for the health insurance companies to diversify and go into the private prison business. 
So, I herd U liek mmm...mmm...mmm...Mudkipz.
~Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 4:39 PM
Posts: 52,
Visits: 90
|
|
| Anyone can see from the legislation that they want to use the Internal Revenue Service to collect the fine for failing to pay for compulsory insurance, and prosecute offenders under the tax laws.
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 4:39 PM
Posts: 52,
Visits: 90
|
|
cedillon (11/8/2009)
I wouldn't get too worked up about the house bill. It won't get far. It's just on the record to placate the big chunk of the Dem base that demands single payer for all. That's not doable so they get a good ole college try from the house, then a heavily watered down compromise that does little but gives us all something to discuss during the mid-terms.
This is not reassuring, because the so-called opponents still haven't uttered a single squeak of protest about the scientific fraud the health fascists use as their pretext for meddling in our personal lives. Instead, they give us that bilge about "socialism" and "death panels," and expect us to be obsessed about fetuses. As for their tactic of merely opposing change, when one side pushes while the other merely resists the push, that is the perfect formula for RATCHETING the system into tyranny. As I've said, they're nothing but dirty traitors who are blatantly selling us out while putting on a phony act of opposition.
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 2:38 PM
Posts: 43,
Visits: 86
|
|
| Penultimate is the "next to last," is that so hard for a republican to understand?
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 2:27 PM
Posts: 28,
Visits: 55
|
|
persia (11/9/2009)
Penultimate is the "next to last," is that so hard for a republican to understand?
Why would you think that what I said is not what I meant? Do you always assume that people don't mean what they say? What does such an assumption say about you? And what on earth gives the idea that I would be a Republican (I assume you meant the party, not one who supports a republican form of government, which I do), anyway? Since you're picking nits about the syntax of my post, I might also assume that you cannot rebut any of the arguments in it.
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 6:56 AM
Posts: 23,
Visits: 41
|
|
| So if the Gov. decides a citizen doesn't have acceptable insurance (and who is to decide) does this also mean that our wonderful Congressmen and women will have to pay in also? I really want to know.
|
|
|
|
